Inconsistent annotation tools—teams then argue across ownership lines.
Asset & Annotation Handoff
Unannotated comps burn both sides arguing about fidelity. Clarify the boundary before choosing the build path.
Annotations, sliced assets and naming conventions for engineering.
Handoff issues
These usually show up before a project starts—or right after a rushed launch.
Mixed asset resolutions—it often surfaces only after production impact.
Unsearchable names—iteration and local integration slow down.
Missing disabled/dark states—users feel it as inconsistent data or UX.
Standard handoff pack
One annotation platform; @2x/@3x rules; naming dictionary; state checklist. Translate design intent into executable spacing, type, color, radius, states and exports—less 'wing it'.
Translate design intent into executable spacing, type, color, radius, states and exports—less 'wing it'.
- Scope written before coding
- Milestones you can accept
- Handover notes included
Highlights
What this engagement typically covers.
Annotation rules
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
Asset export
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
Naming conventions
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
State notes
Included in scope after we confirm stack, constraints and acceptance checks.
What you get
- Annotation link/files
- Asset pack
- Naming table
- State checklist
- One Q&A session
How we work
-
01
Collect comps, with written stage outputs.
-
02
Rules lock, with written stage outputs.
-
03
Annotate & slice, with written stage outputs.
-
04
Eng Q&A, with written stage outputs.
Ready to lock scope?
Share source files—we'll size annotation work.